TitleUnderstanding Ageing. An evaluation of research designs for assessing the interdependence of ageing-related changes.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2001
AuthorsHofer, SM, Sliwinski, MJ
Date Published2001 Nov-Dec
KeywordsAdult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Research Design, Sensitivity and Specificity

<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b>Cross-sectional studies of samples varying widely in age have found moderate to high levels of shared age-related variance among measures of cognitive and physiological capabilities, leading researchers to posit common factors or common causal influences for diverse age-related phenomenon.</p><p><b>OBJECTIVE: </b>The influence of population average changes with age on cross-sectional estimates of association has not been widely appreciated in developmental and ageing research. Covariances among age-related variables in cross-sectional studies are highly confounded in regards to inferences about associations among rates of change within individuals since covariances can result from a number of sources including average population age-related differences (fixed age effects) in addition to initial individual differences and individual differences in rates of ageing (random age effects). Analysis of narrow age-cohort samples may provide a superior analytical basis for testing hypotheses regarding associations between rates of change in cross-sectional studies.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b>The use of age-heterogeneous cross-sectional designs for evaluating interdependence of ageing-related processes is discouraged since associations will not necessarily reflect individual-level correlated rates of change. Typical cross-sectional studies do not provide sufficient evidence for the interdependence of ageing-related changes and should not serve as the basis for theories and hypotheses of ageing. Reanalyzing existing cross-sectional studies using a sequential narrow-age cohort approach provides a useful alternative for evaluating associations between ageing-related changes. Longitudinal designs, however, provide a much stronger basis for inference regarding associations between rates of ageing within individuals.</p>

Alternate JournalGerontology
PubMed ID11721149