TitleTreating depression to remission in older adults: a controlled evaluation of combined escitalopram with interpersonal psychotherapy versus escitalopram with depression care management.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsReynolds, CF, Dew, MAmanda, Martire, LM, Miller, MD, Cyranowski, JM, Lenze, E, Whyte, EM, Mulsant, BH, Pollock, BG, Karp, JF, Gildengers, A, Szanto, K, Dombrovski, AY, Andreescu, C, Butters, MA, Morse, JQ, Houck, PR, Bensasi, S, Mazumdar, S, Stack, JA, Frank, E
JournalInt J Geriatr Psychiatry
Volume25
Issue11
Pagination1134-41
Date Published2010 Nov
ISSN1099-1166
KeywordsAged, Aged, 80 and over, Citalopram, Combined Modality Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Disease Management, Female, Humans, Male, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Remission Induction, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
Abstract

<p><b>OBJECTIVE: </b>More than half of the older adults respond only partially to first-line antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that a depression-specific psychotherapy, Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT), when used adjunctively with escitalopram, would lead to a higher rate of remission and faster resolution of symptoms in partial responders than escitalopram with depression care management (DCM).</p><p><b>METHOD: </b>We conducted a 16-week randomized clinical trial of IPT and DCM in partial responders to escitalopram, enrolling 124 outpatients aged 60 and older. The primary outcome, remission, was defined as three consecutive weekly scores of 7 or less on the Hamilton rating scale for depression (17-item). We conducted Cox regression analyses of time to remission and logistic modeling for rates of remission. We tested group differences in Hamilton depression ratings over time via mixed-effects modeling.</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>Remission rates for escitalopram with IPT and with DCM were similar in intention-to-treat (IPT vs. DCM: 58 [95% CI: 46, 71] vs. 45% [33,58]; p = 0.14) and completer analyses (IPT vs. DCM: 58% [95% CI: 44,72] vs. 43% [30,57]; p = 0.20). Rapidity of symptom improvement did not differ in the two treatments.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION: </b>No added advantage of IPT over DCM was shown. DCM is a clinically useful strategy to achieve full remission in about 50% of partial responders.</p>

DOI10.1002/gps.2443
Alternate JournalInt J Geriatr Psychiatry
PubMed ID20957693
PubMed Central IDPMC3004217
Grant ListP30 MH052247 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
UL1 TR000005 / TR / NCATS NIH HHS / United States
MH065547 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
R01 MH083660 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
R01 MH037869-25 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
MH52247 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
MH37869 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
P30 MH071944 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
MH071944 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
K01 MH065547-05 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
K23 MH086620-01 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
K01 MH065547 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
P30 MH052247-10 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
R01 MH037869 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
K23 MH086620 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States