Title | Screening for dementia by telephone using the memory impairment screen. |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2003 |
Authors | Lipton, RB, Katz, MJ, Kuslansky, G, Sliwinski, MJ, Stewart, WF, Verghese, J, Crystal, HA, Buschke, H |
Journal | J Am Geriatr Soc |
Volume | 51 |
Issue | 10 |
Pagination | 1382-90 |
Date Published | 2003 Oct |
ISSN | 0002-8614 |
Keywords | Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mass Screening, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Telephone |
Abstract | <p><b>OBJECTIVES: </b>: To develop and assess telephone-based screening tests for dementia, especially Alzheimer's disease (AD).</p><p><b>DESIGN: </b>: A cross-sectional validation study nested within a longitudinal study of aging and dementia.</p><p><b>SETTING: </b>: The Einstein Aging Study of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.</p><p><b>PARTICIPANTS: </b>: Three hundred elderly community volunteers living in Bronx County, 27 of whom were diagnosed with dementia based on in-person clinical evaluation. Of the 27 individuals with dementia, 18 had AD.</p><p><b>MEASUREMENTS: </b>: A telephone battery was administered that included the Memory Impairment Screen by telephone (MIS-T, a test of semantic memory), the Category Fluency Test (CF-T), and the Telephone Instrument for Cognitive Status (TICS). An in-person evaluation then followed that included a neurological examination, a neuropsychological battery, demographics, and medical history.</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>: The telephone battery was well accepted. The MIS-T required 4 minutes; the CF-T, 3 minutes; and the TICS, 10 minutes. The MIS-T had excellent sensitivity and specificity when compared with the CF-T and the TICS. Using cutscores on all three tests that provide a sensitivity of 78%, specificity was significantly higher for the MIS-T (93%) than for the CF-T (78%, P<.05) or the TICS (80%, P<.05). Combining the MIS-T and CF-T improved discriminative validity but increased screening time and the complexity of scoring. Normative data for the MIS-T, the CF-T, and the TICS for use in settings with different base rates (prevalence) of dementia are presented in this study.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION: </b>: The MIS-T outperforms the CF-T and the TICS as a valid and time-efficient telephone screen for dementia. For applications that require optimal efficiency and accuracy, the MIS-T is recommended.</p> |
DOI | 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51455.x |
Alternate Journal | J Am Geriatr Soc |
PubMed ID | 14511157 |
Grant List | AG03949 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States |